Transaction sampling review
A short engagement that samples remittance, payment, or lending transactions and reports where the trail breaks.
Pingtung · Taipei · remote walkthroughs
Audits for fintech that read like fieldwork, not a brochure
We sit with compliance officers, product owners, and operations leads to test how controls actually run before a regulator, bank partner, or investor asks the same questions.
Flagship: Regulatory readiness audit
Our primary engagement maps licence obligations, samples transaction and customer files, and delivers a findings letter with ranked remediation — written for fintech teams that must show evidence, not slogans.
- Scope locked to your licence class and product lines
- On-site or hybrid walkthroughs of KYC, settlement, and complaint handling
- Evidence binders prepared for FSC-facing conversations
Related audit work
Supporting engagements that sit beside readiness work when a board, bank sponsor, or acquisition timetable demands a narrower lens.
Investor diligence support
Structured support that turns scattered compliance files into a diligence-ready evidence pack for investors or acquirers.
Complaint handling assessment
A focused look at how consumer and merchant complaints move from intake to closure, with evidence that supervisors can defend.
Read more client storiesThey sampled our remittance files on a Tuesday and had the findings letter on our compliance desk before Friday’s board pack — with one item we still argue about, which is exactly what we needed.
Mei-Ling Chen, Head of Compliance, regional remittance firm
From Field Notes
Practical writing on audit sampling, Taiwan fintech obligations, and how evidence trails hold up under scrutiny.
How we size a KYC sample for a payment institution
Sample size is a judgment call. Here is how we explain that judgment to compliance officers who need a defensible number.
What Taiwan bank sponsors usually ask before renewing a fintech partnership
Bank sponsorship renewals rarely fail on brand polish. They stall on complaint logs, settlement breaks, and unclear ownership of exceptions.
Writing a findings letter that boards actually read
A findings letter fails when every issue looks urgent. Ranking and plain language matter more than annex thickness.